Skip to main content

Harmful Idea: Freedom of Expression Online

Many key players within the international community started to focus on freedom of expression online and after the series of political changes taking place in North Africa and Middle East more and more communities are now focusing -only- on freedom of expression online and other related topics.

Those communities include members of the European Union, U.S. Administration, donors, non-governmental organizations.

Focusing on freedom of expression online and having debates with governments around the world on this topics and funding activities to support freedom of expression online will, on the long term, have negative impact on digital and online communities:

1. This kind of debates will inspire governments and make officials to think of creating new laws and regulations for the online space, content and media. Personally, i think once governments starts to regulate any right they actually limit practicing that right and those laws will be used against netizens in the future. We already have many cases from different countries where netizens faced legal troubles due to their activity online, imagine what will happen when governments come up with new law for the internet.

2. When donors include freedom of expression online as an important and necessary item this will push NGOs to do any activity to get that fund and those NGOs won't actually do something useful. This kind of fund will have really negative impact (we can already see the beginnings of this impact).

3. When this debate grow locally, this will open discussions to regulate all kind of media. So governments -and of course some communities- will want to reform the press law, think of new law to regulate online media, another law for theater and movies,  another law for TV channels...etc

What to Do?
1. Support freedom of expression as a concept. Don't focus on particular medium, support any medium that can be used to exchange information and share opinions. Support freedom of expression in all offline and online mediums without paying special attention to the online.

2. Push for one-law for freedom of expression and access to information. (access to/publishing information)

3. Push to reform local telecommunications law and online companies policies (facebook.com, youtube.com, flickr.com...) . The relation between users, government and companies must change. Users rights must be the main concern and focus.

4. Fund projects to develop communication infrastructure.

Popular posts from this blog

رحلتي في التعافي على مدار ٤ سنين

مفيش اي حد حقيقي هيساعدك غير نفسك.. صدقني مهما كان القاع مظلم وحاسس الحياة متهالكة احضن نفسك طمن نفسك وامسك ايدك خطوات صغيرة. ده عبارة عن مجموعة صور كل واحد بيحكي رحلتي في التعافي والصحة النفسية والبدنية على مدار اخر ٤ سنين عملت فيهم ٣ عمليات جراحية منهم اثنين في رجلي اليمين كان جالي كذا تمزق في الغضروف، واستئصال الزايدة لانها كانت على وشك تعمل بووم. كنت بعارف جامد مع الاكتئاب والتروما، وحالتي النفسية كانت متهالكة تماما ومعاها جسمي وروحي... [قضيت فترات بصلح جسمي] وزني وصل ١٢٥ كيلو على مشاكل غضروف وصدرية وكوليسترول، كنت دبدوب بكرش ثري دي بسند عليه الكيبورد والشاي. المهم، بدأت رحلتي في التعافي خطوات صغيرة، تكريس كل وقتي في تحسين وتطوير حالتي النفسية والبدنية ومعاها الروحانية.. مزيج من الرسم، والتليون، والرقص، والطبلة، والملاكمة، وتاي تشي، وسكاي دايفينج انا فتحت باب الطيارة ونطيت كذا مرة، وسباحة، وركوب عجل يوميا، وجري، وتسلق..  بس حقيقي من كل التجارب دي اكتر حاجة دخلت فيها بقوة ومزاج هي رياضة الكاليسثنكس، واهم حاجة عملتها اني اخدت التعافي بدوام كامل واقصى التزام اقدر عليه. مكنش ...

Few words on Encryption and Egypt

In dangerous times - whether during conflict, unrest, or disinformation - encryption isn’t a luxury. It’s a life-saving layer of security for individuals and societies. Weakening it doesn’t make us safer; it makes everyone more vulnerable. And no one is safe until everyone is safe. A few words on #encryption and #Egypt's context: 1. On decryption assistance mandates and Egypt’s context Decryption assistance mandates - as in forcing companies or individuals to provide access to encrypted data - don’t really function in practice, whether in Egypt or elsewhere. In Egypt’s case, we don’t see explicit legal mechanisms for ‘lawful access’ like those proposed in Western debates, but we do see functional equivalents through other means: broad surveillance powers, vague national security clauses, pressure on service providers, infrastructure ownership by the state, and granting isps and mobile operators secret licenses that gives the security full access to backend. There’s no clear overs...